From Move On...
The Senate has the power to approve or reject judicial nominations because judges -- above all else -- must be trusted by Americans on all sides to rule fairly. So why does Bush refuse to send new nominees both parties can agree on? Because while his presidency will be over in 4 years, the judges he appoints will be on the bench for the rest of their lives. This is Bush's big push to lock in his hard right, corporate-friendly ideology for decades to come -- and that is exactly why we must not back down now.
The fight begins today. The Myers vote is a key test -- and may well determine whether Bush can stack the judiciary, all the way up to the Supreme Court, with a steady stream of hard right, pro-corporate judges. It's crucial that our Senators know that we out here in America are counting on them to hold the line against all 20 of Bush's rejected, partisan judges.
On ABC Nightly News last night, they had a story about the Supremos striking down the juvenile death penalty. The reporter ended by explaining that conservatives are upset that Anthony Kennedy, a Reagan appointee, wrote the majority decision on this and that they consider it more evidence that they have to get judges who they can "rely on" not to change their positions over time. Because, you know, what you want in a good judge is someone who follows ideology blindly and refuses to rethink anything.
Many of the appointments Congress will be considering are for life. And Bill Frist has been threatening to go "nuclear" to prevent Democrats from blocking the President's nominations. This is bad.

